ChatGPT Has 12% of Google’s Search Volume but Google Sends 190x More Traffic to Websites
Marketing reports, apps, and automations, handled. Meet Letaido.
Marketing reports, apps, and automations, handled. Meet Letaido.
The only AI marketing platform built on Ahrefs’ proprietary web index.
The only AI marketing platform built on Ahrefs’ proprietary web index.
“The AI marketing platform we needed didn’t exist. So we built it.”

Tim Soulo, CMO at Ahrefs
“The AI marketing platform we needed didn’t exist. So we built it.”

Tim Soulo, CMO at Ahrefs

By Patrick Stox
Technical SEO at Ahrefs
Reviewed by
February 11, 20263 min read
299 Linking websitesArticle performance data from Ahrefs
Contents
- Key takeaways
- Daily volume comparison
- How much of ChatGPT is search?
- Website traffic comparison
- The CTR difference
ChatGPT processed 2.5 billion prompts per day as of July 2025.¹ That's 18% of Google's 13.7 billion daily searches, based on the 5 trillion searches per year they announced in January 2025.²
While ChatGPT has nearly a fifth of Google's query volume, people use the platforms in different ways.
I wanted to see how ChatGPT compared to Google, not just on the total number of searches, but also searches where they compete with Google, how much traffic they send to websites, and the CTR differences in the systems.
Let's dig in.
Contents
- Key takeaways
- Daily volume comparison
- How much of ChatGPT is search?
- Website traffic comparison
- The CTR difference
- 65% of ChatGPT usage qualifies as search, but this can be lower depending on how you define search.
- For every search-like query in ChatGPT, there are 8.33 searches in Google.
- Google sends 190x more traffic to websites than ChatGPT.
- ChatGPT’s CTR is 96% lower than Google’s CTR.
The data shows two different business models: Google connects people to websites, ChatGPT keeps them in conversation. If AI search is the future of search, website traffic is in trouble.
| Platform | Daily Searches/Prompts | Annual Total |
|---|---|---|
| 13.7 billion | 5+ trillion | |
| ChatGPT | 2.5 billion | ~912 billion |
Google processes over 5 trillion searches annually (source: Google Internal Data, January 2025).
ChatGPT handles 18 billion messages weekly as of July 2025, which equals approximately 2.5 billion prompts per day.
Not every ChatGPT prompt is a search query. According to research from OpenAI and Harvard, which analyzed 1.5 million conversations, 24% is pure search and 51.6% is asking intent. Asking intent includes interactions where users seek advice, perspective, or information to improve judgment, rather than delegating task completion.
I’ve seen some studies that used those numbers for comparison, but I don’t agree with them. Google does more than just search. There are tools for calculations, translation, and more which are included in other categories in the study. Even things like coding help are categorized differently, but devs have been searching issues on Google (and Stack Overflow) for many years.
For example, we see hundreds of millions of searches every month for people looking to translate things on Google.

Looking at their examples, I would classify 65% of the searches on ChatGPT as things that were traditionally searched on Google. This is higher than what the researchers classified, but I have more access to data on what people search than they did.
| Category | % of ChatGPT Usage | ChatGPT Daily Volume | % of Google's Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pure Search (facts, products, recipes) | 24.0% | 600 million | 4.38% |
| Asking Intent (search + advice) | 51.6% | 1.29 billion | 9.42% |
| My Search Classification (things people traditionally searched on Google) | 65.0% | 1.625 billion | 11.86% |
ChatGPT gets ~12% of the search volume of Google for things people have traditionally searched for on Google. For some comparison, it’s estimated that Bing gets 1.2 billion searches a day. ChatGPT has surpassed Bing in search!
If you haven’t seen it yet, Ahrefs built <https://chatgpt-vs-google.com/> with data from Ahrefs Web Analytics across 76,000 websites.
If we look at the traffic coming to websites, Google sends 190x more traffic to websites than ChatGPT. Google makes up nearly 40% of traffic to websites and ChatGPT just 0.21%.

This is where the platforms diverge completely.
I ran the numbers for the different classifications, but again I believe that my search classification is more accurate than those from the paper. I came up with ChatGPT having a 96% lower CTR than Google.
Calculation method: Estimated CTR = (Traffic Share % / Daily Queries in billions) × 10
| Platform/Category | Daily Queries | Traffic Share | Estimated CTR | CTR vs Google |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.7 billion | 39.98% | 29.2% | Baseline | |
| ChatGPT (Pure Search) | 600 million | 0.21% | 3.5% | 88% lower |
| ChatGPT (Asking Intent) | 1.29 billion | 0.21% | 1.6% | 94% lower |
| ChatGPT (My Search Classification) | 1.625 billion | 0.21% | 1.3% | 96% lower |
| ChatGPT (All Usage) | 2.5 billion | 0.21% | 0.84% | 97% lower |
Final thoughts
Google remains the dominant search engine with 5.5x more daily activity. ChatGPT made headway into search in a short amount of time. They’ve passed longtime search rivals like Bing.
However, I’m not sure if website owners will accept the drop in traffic or if they will eventually push back on AI search.

Post byPatrick Stox
Patrick Stox is an independent SEO consultant. Former Product Advisor, Technical SEO, and Brand Ambassador at Ahrefs. Before that he was a Technical SEO at IBM for many years, worked at an agency, had his own consultancy, and was in-house at a B2B company. A long time ago he started his career as a developer.
He’s an organizer for the Triangle SEO Meetup, the Tech SEO Connect conference, he runs a Technical SEO Slack group, and is a moderator for /r/TechSEO on Reddit.
Patrick was the lead author for the SEO chapter of the 2021 Web Almanac and reviewer for the 2022 chapter. He helped define the role of Search Marketing Strategist for the US Department of Labor. He also co-wrote the SEO Book For Beginners by Ahrefs and was the Technical Review Editor for The Art of SEO 4th Edition.
He’s spoken at 100+ industry events including Pubcon, SMX, Tech SEO Boost, Ad World, Digital Summit, and many more. He’s written 100+ articles for industry sites like Search Engine Land, Search Engine Journal, MarTech, and right here at Ahrefs. He was a finalist for SEO Speaker of the Year and SEO Contributor of the Year at the 2018 Search Engine Land Awards. He was also an EzineArticles Platinum author back in the day and still has the mug to prove it.
Patrick has judged nearly a dozen search awards for multiple years including the US Search Awards, UK Search Awards, and Interactive Marketing Awards. He participated in and documented the world’s largest SEO contest to date, the Wix SEO Hero contest which he arguably should have won.
Reviewed by

Keep learning
[
Tim Soulo](https://ahrefs.com/blog/author/tim-soulo/)December 1, 2023
[
Si Quan Ong](https://ahrefs.com/blog/author/si-quan-ong/)June 1, 2026
### The 50 Most-Cited Websites in Perplexity (September 2026)
[
Ryan Law](https://ahrefs.com/blog/author/ryan-law/)September 2, 2025
### New Study: How Often Do AI Assistants Hallucinate Links? (16 Million URLs Studied)
[
Mateusz Makosiewicz](https://ahrefs.com/blog/author/mateusz-makosiewicz/)August 18, 2025
### Generative Engine Optimization: Growth Strategies and Metrics For the AI Era
[
Mateusz Makosiewicz](https://ahrefs.com/blog/author/mateusz-makosiewicz/)May 30, 2025
### Almost Half of Google Searches Are Branded. Here’s Why That Matters
Your weekly marketing’s must-reads
Join 284K marketers for weekly news, useful reads, industry updates, and the memes you didn’t know you needed.
Explore what’s inside the newsletter →
Blog
A beginner’s guide to SEO basics, with resources to help you start ranking higher.
Product
© 2026 Ahrefs Pte. Ltd. (201227417H) 16 Raffles Quay, #33-03 Hong Leong Building, Singapore 048581
Cookie Settings
English
